A lot of folks are asking why banks will not work with them in alleviating their mortgage burden. Statements like, "if they just knocked off a couple grand I would be happy to stay and pay the loan" or "please help me stay in my home" is nearly commonplace language for people who bought during the bubble. Some observers have blamed the banks for being incompetent or irrational or outright nefarious. If we understand that firms are profit maximizers then there must be other reasons for banks not working with struggling homeowners.
One of the popularized explanations is securitization. That you cannot modify a loan when it has been pooled with other loans. PSA's or pooling and service agreements dictate how modifications can be performed and sometimes a services can only perform modifications on a certain number of mortgages. While it sounds plausible that this would be an obstacle in working with borrowers, authors Adelino, Gerardi and Willen find evidence that this is not necessarily the culprit.
In a Boston Federal Reserve Paper, Adelino, Gerardi and Willen posit that the reason lenders do not work with deliquent buyers is that (direct quotes after the numbers):
1. lenders expect to recover more from a foreclosure than from a modified loan.
2. renegotiation exposes the lender to two types of risks that can dramatically increase its cost.
a. "Self-cure" Risk: 30% of seriously delinquent buyers make up the missed payments without a modification. This implies that money spent on the modification is simly wasted by the lender.
b. Borrowers redefault. In their sample, a large proportion of the modified loans went into default six months after the modification.
In a land of falling home prices, delaying a foreclosure actually costs more money. Further, as homeowners are aware that they may be walking from the home, they put less expense in maintaining the home or in some cases, they deliberately damage the property. This is a reason why banks would rather foreclose on a home and market it as soon as possible.
Currently, we are seeing banks use a short sale process more and more and this may be due to accounting requirements as well as Federal oversight or in some cases lenders may find that the servicing of short sale properties is more efficient than REO's. One thing is for sure, in a dynamic environment like this, we really have to be quick to educate ourselves.
The Adelino, Gerardi and Willen paper can be found at http://www.bos.frb.org/.